Dividing The Bread Completing Story For Class 6, 7, 8, SSC & HSC

When you read dividing the bread completing story, you come across a simple situation that reflects real human behavior. You see how small conflicts can grow when fairness is ignored and selfish thinking takes control. This story is widely included in SSC and HSC exams because it teaches you a clear lesson through a relatable event.
In this narrative, two characters struggle to divide bread equally, but their disagreement invites a third party who takes advantage of the situation. You begin to understand how lack of unity leads to loss.
Dividing The Bread Completing Story For Class 6
Once, two cats found a piece of bread lying on the road. Both cats wanted to divide it equally, but they could not decide who should get the bigger part. They started fighting with each other. A monkey saw them arguing and came to help. He told the cats that he would divide the bread fairly. The cats trusted him and gave him the bread.
The monkey divided the bread into two pieces, but one piece was a little bigger than the other. He took a small bite from the bigger piece to make them equal. Then the other piece became bigger, so he took a bite from that one too. The monkey continued this trick again and again. Soon, the bread became very small. Finally, he ate the remaining piece and left the cats with nothing.
The cats felt sad and realized their mistake. If they had shared the bread peacefully, they could have enjoyed it together.
Moral: Unity and understanding can prevent loss.
Dividing The Bread Completing Story For Class 7-8
Once, two cats found a loaf of bread while walking on a road. Both of them were hungry and wanted an equal share. They tried to divide the bread themselves, but each cat thought that the other was getting a larger portion.
Their disagreement soon turned into a quarrel. Neither of them wanted to give up their claim. At that time, a monkey came there and asked about their problem. He offered to divide the bread equally between them.
The cats accepted his offer and gave him the bread. The monkey broke it into two pieces, but one piece was slightly bigger than the other. He said that he needed to make them equal and took a bite from the larger piece.
After that, the other piece became bigger. The monkey again took a bite from it. He continued doing this until almost the whole bread was gone. The cats requested him to stop and return the remaining bread, but the monkey said that the little piece left was his payment for solving their problem. Then he ate it too. The cats went away hungry and understood that their own argument had caused their loss.
Moral: A quarrel between two people often benefits a third person
Dividing The Bread Completing Story For SSC
Once, two cats found a loaf of bread on the road. Both wanted a fair share, but they could not agree on how to divide it. After arguing for a long time, they decided to seek help from a monkey. The monkey pretended to be a judge and agreed to divide the bread equally.
He broke the bread into two pieces, but one piece was slightly larger than the other. To make them equal, he took a bite from the larger piece. Then the second piece became larger. Again, he took a bite from that piece. In this way, the monkey continued eating from both pieces while claiming that he was trying to make them equal.
At last, only a tiny portion of bread remained. The cats begged the monkey to return it, but he said it was his fee for judging the matter and ate the rest. The cats went away hungry and disappointed. They realized that their greed and lack of unity had caused their loss.
Moral: When two people quarrel, a third person may take advantage of the situation.
Dividing The Bread Completing Story For HSC
Once upon a time, two cats found a large piece of bread. Both of them were hungry and wanted an equal share. They tried to divide the bread themselves, but each cat thought that the other was getting a larger portion. As a result, they started arguing. Their quarrel continued for a long time, and neither of them was willing to compromise.
At that moment, a monkey was passing by. Seeing the dispute, he offered to settle the matter. The cats trusted him and handed over the bread. The monkey broke the bread into two pieces, but one piece appeared slightly larger than the other. To make the portions equal, he took a bite from the larger piece. Then the other piece became larger. Again, he took a bite from that side. He repeated the process several times.
The cats watched helplessly as the bread became smaller and smaller. Finally, only a tiny piece remained. They requested the monkey to return it, but he refused. He claimed that the remaining piece was his reward for serving as a judge. Saying this, he ate the last piece as well.
The cats left the place hungry and sad. They understood that if they had settled the matter peacefully, they would not have lost everything. Their foolish quarrel had allowed another to benefit from their disagreement.
Moral: When two people fight, a third person often gains the advantage.
Dividing The Bread Completing Story in Bengali
একদিন দুটি বিড়াল রাস্তায় একটি রুটির টুকরো খুঁজে পেল। দুজনেই ক্ষুধার্ত ছিল এবং তারা রুটিটি সমানভাবে ভাগ করতে চেয়েছিল। কিন্তু কে বেশি অংশ পাবে তা নিয়ে তারা ঝগড়া শুরু করল।
তারা নিজেরা রুটি ভাগ করতে না পেরে একটি বানরের কাছে সাহায্য চাইল। বানর তাদের বলল যে সে ন্যায়বিচার করে রুটিটি সমান ভাগ করে দেবে। বিড়াল দুটি তার কথায় বিশ্বাস করে রুটিটি তার হাতে তুলে দিল।
বানর রুটিটিকে দুই ভাগ করল। কিন্তু একটি অংশ একটু বড় হয়ে গেল। সমান করার অজুহাতে সে বড় অংশ থেকে একটু খেয়ে নিল। এরপর অন্য অংশটি বড় হয়ে গেল। তখন সে আবার সেই অংশ থেকে একটু খেয়ে নিল।
এভাবে সমান করার নামে বানরটি দুই দিক থেকেই রুটি খেতে থাকল। কিছুক্ষণ পর রুটির প্রায় সবটুকুই শেষ হয়ে গেল। বিড়াল দুটি বানরকে বাকি অংশ ফেরত দিতে অনুরোধ করল।
কিন্তু বানর বলল যে বিচার করার পারিশ্রমিক হিসেবে বাকি অংশটি তার প্রাপ্য। এরপর সে শেষ অংশটুকুও খেয়ে ফেলল।
বিড়াল দুটি খালি হাতে ফিরে গেল এবং বুঝতে পারল যে তাদের নিজেদের ঝগড়ার কারণেই তারা ক্ষতিগ্রস্ত হয়েছে।
শিক্ষণীয় বিষয়: দুইজনের মধ্যে ঝগড়া হলে তৃতীয় ব্যক্তি প্রায়ই তার সুযোগ নেয়।
Conclusion
The lesson from dividing the bread completing story remains highly relevant in your daily life. You clearly see how small disagreements can lead to major loss when you fail to resolve them wisely. The two cats could have shared the bread peacefully, but their argument gave the monkey an opportunity to take everything. This teaches you the importance of unity, patience, and fair thinking. Whenever you face a conflict, you should try to settle it calmly instead of letting others interfere. In this way, you can avoid unnecessary loss and make better decisions in both academic and real-life situations.
FAQs
Q1. What is the moral of dividing the bread completing story?
The moral is that when two people quarrel, a third person may take advantage of the situation and benefit from their conflict.
Q2. Why did the cats fail to divide the bread?
The cats failed because they were greedy and could not agree on a fair division, which led to unnecessary argument.
Q3. How did the monkey take advantage of the situation?
The monkey pretended to help but kept eating the bread while trying to make both sides equal, eventually taking everything.
Q4. What lesson does this story teach students?
This story teaches you to solve problems peacefully and not let small disputes turn into bigger losses.
Q5. How can you apply this story in real life?
You can apply it by staying calm during disagreements, making fair decisions, and avoiding outside interference in personal conflicts.





